Broadway is already moving on this. He has already proposed tearing down half or almost all of the historic structure and just leaving the remaining facade and constructing 12 new homes behind it. This is worse than tearing the whole thing down in my opinion. (I really wish this was not proposed by one of our Historic Commission members). Leaving a ruinous wall and destroying the WHOLE of the structure will be devastating to the integrity of the building (which is supposed to be a very uniform shape) and the space it inhabits. Art Deco was very Palladian in its design.. with simple and elegant curves and angles, but VERY symmetrical geometries. One of the key signatures of Deco is that it is equal dimensions on all four sides. (Think the Chrysler building in NY, or the Bullocks Wilshire building in LA). Tearing down part of the structure will be worse than razing the whole thing. A COMPLETE building speaks to the scale and space of its surroundings, fitting harmoniously in place in the center of the block, neighborhood, district, town. Is Old Town an "historic district" or not? An historic district does not have 12 NEW structures in it. It would cease to be "historic." East Clinton speaks to our time, place, and history, and is in perfect harmony with its surroundings. It is a cultural, historical, and architectural landmark in the community. It gives Huntsville a sense of time and place, a certain look, feel, memory that is familiar to its residents. It is a landmark that orients its inhabitants with a sense of scale and space with harmony and order, it directs us with a majestic presence and gives hierarchy to a space. It gives a sense of time and place to Huntsville. Don't let Huntsville be hijacked by developers.
I encourage everyone to familiarize yourselves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Deco